Find a Lawyer

SH. MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus SAADAT ENTERPRISES

Sections 196, 212 and 283 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 10 of the Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 2 (a), 4, 17 and 20 of the arbitration agreements signed by an individual Not authorized by resolution. The authenticity of the directors cannot be referred to arbitration of the dispute by the company on the basis of such person's participation in the arbitration proceedings will not be considered valid and the award rules adopted in it cannot be ruled.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. ABDUL MAJEED 2009 CLC 386
• Ch. MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN 2009 PLD 386
• MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ v. State 2009 MLD 387
• Sheikh ALLA-UD-DIN v. CANTONMENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER, Walton Road, Lahore 2009 PLD 389
• JOSIP STIMAC v. MELITTA SYED SHAH 2009 PLD 393
• AQSAL alias KALOO v. State 2009 PCrLJ 394
• TASHARUF HUSSAIN SHAH alias KHANA SHAH v. State 2009 YLR 396
• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. MAGISTRATE SECTION 30, PINDI GHEB, DISTRICT ATTOCK 2009 PLD 401

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

jobs for advocates from Rashidabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes