Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN versus SARDAR FATEH KHAN

Section 7 (IV) (c) of the Suite Valuation Act (VII of 1887), Section 8 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the section 42 declaration of suit for specific performance on the basis of the decree for compliance with the conditions Was not relieved by the Relief of such variable and unlawful claim for dismissal and reversal claims, and court fees on appeal, the scope value suit case for jurisdictional purposes, Shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of 1887. Was entitled to be charged as such relief is fully covered under Section 9 (IV) (c) of the Court Fees Act 1877.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. State 2009 YLR 1784
• MULTAN ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD. v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL (INTELLIGENCE & INVESTIGATION) SALES TAX, MULTAN 2009 PTD 1785
• ABDUL AZIZ v. State 2009 YLR 1789
• MARGALLA EDUCATION TRUST v. Dr. Col. (Retd.) M. AFZAL KIANI 2009 YLR 1795
• ALLAH DITTA v. MUHAMMAD UMAR 2009 YLR 1811
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR v. State 2009 YLR 1813
• MUHAMMAD ALI v. WALI MUHAMMAD 2009 YLR 1817
• AHMED SHER KHAN v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB LAHORE 2009 YLR 1820

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

top advocate from Sargodha lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes