Section 2302 (b) / 32 /, 33 324 /, 34, 7 337 D&2 302 (c) The complainant for the testimony of the evidence suppressed the material facts in the FIR, especially the accused and his accomplice. The suspect's motive for the son's injuries and the loss of his car was not strong enough to assassinate so many people that eye witnesses introduced new facts to bring in an ocular account based on medical evidence. Three suspects were not present at the site of the incident at the time of the incident. The police investigating prosecution involved the entire family of the accused, including his two sons who were students and the evidence of his elderly father's prosecution is full of material contradictions and improvements, while the defense evidence is truth and defense. Appear closer to The request made by the accused can also be justified. The right to self-defense was a fundamental right that was guaranteed by law while the accused and his son were in close contact with the complainant and others. As I was heading to Main Road, a number of five men, armed with sticks and knives, attacked the accused and his son, who retaliated without bringing any injuries, resulting in his injuries. Two people were killed and three witnesses were injured in the car. The suspect had the right to defend himself and his son and his property before the shooting of the accused, but no doubt, In the process, he was overturned with the correct sentence and as a result the conviction of the accused was set aside and instead he was sentenced under section 302 (c).
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
