SHAIKH ALL-UD-DIN versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Section 55 (3) and 63 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVI, R15 and OVII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Impact of Non-compliance of Constitutional Request Applications and Affidavit of Petition Had contested the seat of the Punjab Provincial Assembly and declared it a candidate liable, who filed an election petition and questioned the authenticity of the said election, which was filed before the Election Tribunal under section 63 of the Public Representation Act, 1976. There was a delay. , R 11, The CPC and the Election Tribunal rejected the election petition's rejection that the election petition transmitted by the plaintiff did not comply with the mandatory provisions of the law as soon as the election petition was approved. This was a significant mistake in both the affirmation of the affidavit's election petition and the re-issuance of the affidavit that Ndent needed to confirm, to the best of his knowledge, and not only on the information to which he was truthful, as O VI, R15 (2), did not comply with the provisions of law under the provisions of CPC. Validation of the applications was fatal, which, under Section 55 (3) of the Representation, People Act, 1976, requires that every election and every schedule or application thereof be signed by the applicant and the procedures laid down in the Code of Conduct. This will be confirmed by. 1908, the High Court accepts the constitutional request and dismisses the election petition.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
