IFTIKHAR ALI versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, NANKANA SAHIB
Section 491 Habitat Corp. Ditto was neither named in the FIR nor was the police required in any other case; Section HA and a sub-inspector illegally removed the ditto from his home. Was taken away and not only detained at a legitimate police station, but also tortured to find out about the whereabouts of his fugitive son in a criminal case, such as inhumane The movement was not only a clear and abrupt violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, but also the international human rights law. Not every person can be illegally imprisoned and tortured for obtaining information about their relative or any other person involved in any crime, which was absconding with the police, both police officers mentioned above. Abused his authority and his process. Detenu c the law and not only should they be held accountable by the High Court, but also by their authorities, to set an example for others then was freely appointed, but sub inspector 1 , Rs. 00,000 worth of recoverable charges which detained Datano in illegal custody and Rs. 50,000 was recovered from Inspector Section HA which failed to ensure that his The police station was free. The money recovered from power abusive officers was directed to pay to Datano because it was dealt with as a result of unlawful detention and physical injury compensation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
