IRSHAD AHMED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION (FBR), ISLAMABAD
Sections 2 (K), 2 (RR), 17, 168 and 186 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The terms of the constitutional petition / detention and non-possession of notice are not issued by the customs authorities in the applicant's property. The large quantities of printed papers seized and seized, for which the applicants could not produce any documentary evidence, were submitted by the applicants that the authorities seized the goods without the issuance of a legal notice. I cannot take and seize them - the notification was to trade / detain - that is to dispose of or dispose of the goods in the final form. Any action which, after the termination of such proceedings, commenced after the seizure of goods by the customs authorities under section 1 of section 168 of the Customs Act, 1969, The requirement for the issuance of notice under Section 168 of the Act, 1969, was initiated from the date of the seizure. There was no illegal interference or even irregularity in the arrest of the applicants or the seizure of goods. The amendments were made in the years 2004 and 2005 and the detention was allowed under sections 17 and 186 of the Customs Act 1969.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
