Section 262626 of the Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) suspension of powers under section 426, CCCC should decide on the relevant facts without entering into the matter or commenting on the merits of the case. ? In-depth appreciation or investigation and scrutiny of evidence, conviction cannot be suspended and evidence established on the basis of crime detection against the accused can be reviewed only once, the evidence made by the appellate court Can't query on checking. The trial court will consider the decision itself, in conformity with the law and when dealing with the application under section 262626, CRPC, where the appellate court, upon understanding the facts in the trial decision, concluded. Will arrive Where a judgment is found to be a legal error, it will be permissible to suspend and bail out the sentence, but it will also be taken care of in order to reproduce the evidence of the evidence or There should be no doubt about the merits of this case, no doubt, in the present case, each of the applicants / accused was given a firearm injury, but the judgment itself showed that It was a fire that was shot after a fatal injury that did not apply to the head of the slain trial court. Was brought to consideration, while the failure to establish motives or motives by imposing a mitigation penalty on the applicants would not be sufficient to draw any negative indication against the prosecution, but judgments by its subjects. The effect and legality of it
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
