CH. ABDUL GHAFOOR TAHIR versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION PEOPLES COLONY, FAISALABAD
Section 99 F-FIN Pakistan (1973), Article 199 was named in the FIR for special constitutional jurisdiction with specific charges against them, the first to disclose a cognizable offense. The commission is committed that no criminal liability can be laid on this charge. He was dragged into a criminal case to withdraw money, needed a fact-finding investigation which could not be initiated by the High Court in summary proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitution, disputing the facts in the High Court constitutional jurisdiction. Could do. The first offense was committed, while in the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction, the ordinary course of trial before the court was that the High Court had no jurisdiction to terminate the FIR by appreciating the documents presented by the parties. It should not provide an opportunity for scrutiny. Or contradict the documents in question, since the invoice was subpoena All applications raised for termination of the FIR can be filed legally before the trial court. The complainant did not indicate any wrongdoing in order to falsely implicate the accused, but a constitutional request was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
