ABDUL HAFEEZ versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE
RInfection of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner, Appointment of pre-conditional hereditary claim Under the jurisdiction of the High Court, the applicant was enraged at the order passed by the authorities under which he was appointed as the office of lumberman. Was not assigned to, although it has the legal status of the hereditary claim was in the rule of ancient law, but the hereditary claim was not the only means of appointing the limber, it was only one of the relevant reservations for such appointment, Which had to be based on merit and blood relations or claims of preference could not be made. At the time of applying for the position of lumberman in the matter of appointment, the applicant was landless while the respondent owned 87 kanals and 12 mars of land and he too was left behind by the defendants in education, the applicant had the bank. The allegations against disobedience remain unabated in front of the forum. In the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, change your own preferences under the High Court to the competent jurisdiction unless it is shown that the decision made by the competent authorities is in violation of any jurisdiction or any illegal one. Interference has been faced, the constitutional petition does not exempt the permanent finding of the courts, the High Court refused to interfere in the appointment. The limber petition was dismissed in due course
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
