Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 bail, the pre-arrest application of a further inquiry grant, the trial court was instructed to complete the trial within one month. , But the trial court could not. That, the defendant filed a bail plea for delay in trial, the legal delay in the trial was primarily due to the filing of a private complaint, the second woman by a complainant with whom Allegedly illicit contact was established, the circumstances alone could not be justified in the delay in the trial. The accused was in jail since 8 2 2007 and could not be held there for any suspended period. Without further progress, the accused's case came under further jurisdiction. Inquiries because three versions were available on record, ie one is given in the FIR. The second was described in the complaint filed by the complainant. And the third, as included in the complaint filed by the women with whom the accused allegedly made illicit contact. And after recording the evidence in which version of his case would be true, further, `` The accused was sentenced to slip at 16/17 years, with two accomplices named in the FIR. During which they were found innocent. The inquiry and the fact that the accused's case had surrounded the inquiry further, the accused had already been recovered and no further investigation was needed on the matter, the accused was granted bail after his arrest. , Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
