Section 2 (g), (h), (t), (u), and value of evidence, according to the report of the chemical inspector, stated that the injection contained opium alkaloids, but the chemical executor failed to provide a percentage of the opium alkaloids. , Which was found to be a component of the substance recovered in accordance with Section 3 of the Control of Drugs. The Federal Government, 1997, required the government to formulate rules stating that the percentage of liquid preparations required by clauses (g) (h) (t) and (u) of section 2 of the Control of Narcotic Substances For the purpose, in the case of recovery of any material described under clauses (g) (h) and (u) of section 2 of the said Act, pursuant to the provisions of section 3 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, 1997 I was provided with. Until the government formulates the rules, this will be determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Act, while the chemical examiner failed to provide the percentages of opiate alkaloids when inspecting the existing material. Was detected. Export injections The chemical executor who was under legal obligation to detect, found that the percentage of opiate alkaloids, failed to do so, appeals against the special court order under which the applicant's percentages of opium An application is made to determine. Alkaloids were excluded from the material allegedly exported from the applicant, were set aside and the applicant's application was obtained before the trial court's permission.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
