The testimony of Section 302 (b) was admitted by both the facts in their statements; there was long-standing enmity between the parties. According to the complainant, he and his deceased brother were subjected to the alleged aggression. The prosecution's evidence is that an attempt was made on the life of the complainant, though he was only two feet away from the victim, which was only five feet away from the victim, thus indicating that the accused. There is no problem with The enforcement of the complaint against the complainant denied the prosecution's prosecution, which the complainant and other prosecutor's witnesses expressed as the possibility that the incident did not take place as alleged by the prosecutor. When witnesses were present at the scene of the incident. After this incident, his first reaction would be to save the victim's life as he was alive in a wounded girl n in the presence of confessional enmity and the fact that the complainant was the real brother of the victim and the second witness of the prosecution. His wife's sister had a son, both witnesses were interested and his testimony had to be subjected to careful scrutiny by which nothing was disclosed. Investigating officers were called to the scene on the day of the incident that the investigating officer was summoned to join the investigation into the murder of the complainant's other brother. Police showed some confusion during the preparation of the injury statement because the crime science weapon and the crime was empty the same day the forensic science laboratory was sent, police report
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
