SHAHNAWAZ RANJHA versus RETURNING OFFICER (SYED PERVEZ ALI SHAH)/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, SARGODHA
Section 2 (xxvi) (xli) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), Section 2 (xxx) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) Constitutional Application Deputy Zilla Nazim, Election of Election Deputy Zalia Nazim contested the constituency against respondents being elected against a specific seat for the workers / farmers in the constituency. As a voter in the Electoral College for the selection of the Deputy Zila Nazim, the Deputy Zila Nazim requested that the defendant was not a worker. Therefore, he was not eligible to be elected a member of the District Council, and then the respondent's allegation of deputy Zila Nazim's legitimacy was that he violated the constitutional provisions and the Punjab Local Government Ordinance. Presented himself as an activist while contesting the election of a member of. , 2001, thus, unlawfully succeeded in seizing a public office for which he was not eligible for the High Court, in the wake of such plea, satisfying the questions raised by the applicant himself. Whether the defendant was or not was eligible to hold such a public office record, the respondent stated that the respondent was the owner of about one acre of agricultural land and was working in the sugar mills on behalf of the administration. The loan against three banks was borrowed against the respondent's application for distribution of agricultural land pending. Earlier, the relevant respondents did not challenge the authenticity of the documents by the DDO (R) and the plaintiff certificates of Patwari Halika which showed on the plaintiff's documents that the defendants did not show due to agricultural land. In the meantime, it does
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
