Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LIMITED versus PEARL FABRICS LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Article Su78 suits for the receipt of loan amount by the defendant (director of the lender company), the testimony of section Q Qun law, from the testimony of the defendant No one had stated that the letter was signed by the plaintiff on bail. The plaintiff had neither examined the minor witness nor any person in whose presence such letter was executed. Claims may have arisen on the basis of the corporate record already challenged in the plaintiff's case. The documents available in the record did not match or match the defendant's signature. Against the guarantor's signature on documents plaintiff in the suit dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009

• FALAK SHER v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1176
• Mst. SHAZIA PARVEEN v. State 2009 YLR 1180
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TOBA TEK SINGH 2009 PCrLJ 1182
• MUHAMMAD TAHIR v. QOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Director General Excise and Taxation 2009 MLD 1184
• MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2009 YLR 1186
• Mst. ROBINA ASHRAF v. Mst. SHAGUFTA FARDOUS 2009 PCrLJ 1189
• TOWN MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION through Town Nazim v. MUHAMMAD BANARAS KHAN 2009 CLC 1191
• MUHAMMAD ANWAR alias AMBA v. State 2009 YLR 1191

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2009 →

registration advocate from Doaaba lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes