Sections 497 (5) and 498 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), denial of bail before Articles 302/148/149 bail were merely designated in the FIR and no special role was made in this case. Had to go on With the co-accused, fully armed, but not fired on the witnesses of the victim or the prosecutor, did not appeal because of this, the accused merely resorted to aerial shootings, the accused alleged that he had occasioned Only 12 bore guns were fired but the record does not show that he is the same. License was given in his name. The accused's nephew claimed that the investigating officer had transferred the request for interim custody of the gun. Had concluded that the accused had not participated in the incident and reached the spot after the incident, the accused involved in the cases. Regarding, no criminal case was sentenced when the co-accused's father was prosecuted with the accused, at that time it was unreliable to turn the charges over to him. The profession was wrongly implicated with some indirect purpose of becoming a lawyer and harassing and humiliating; bail was allowed before the arrest by the sessions court, which did not take any kind of illegal action, In these circumstances the bail was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
