Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the cancellation of section 376 bail, no doubt the application for the accused, was designated in the FIR with a special role, but no witnesses to the alleged incident took place. There was no account under which the commission was designated to be merely nominal. Because of the crime, it is not necessary that the accused be prosecuted because the complainant did not immediately report the matter to the police as he had been charged with a hate crime. Did not make a call at the time of the commission of the crime, especially when there was an empty hand, the lady could respond and immediately report it to the police, but she did not do so to establish the fact. No medical examination was conducted whether it was the accused who did not allow the lady to be a stranger. When she revealed that she was her husband's friend, he came to her house, but he allowed the accused to come to her house without investigating the matter. The statement of the woman, who reported the matter to the police after two months' interval and did not conduct a medical examination by herself, cannot be determined as to indicate that semen-containing swabs. The possibility of making false allegations of the accused cannot be ruled out whether or not the accused is related to it. The story stated in the FIR was considered to be an incomprehensible and illogical case of the accused, which further investigates his crime. Was guaranteed and there was no reason to interfere with the bail order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
