MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TOBA TEK SINGH
Section 182 of the Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), abolishing Section 3 proceedings was a contention that proceedings or complaints could be filed under Section 182, PPC, if the same was found to be invalid and canceled after the FIR registration. And since the information was provided to the senior police officer, Section HO was not authorized to make a complaint or to submit a complaint under section 182, the PPC said, adding that the dispute was invalid and totally baseless. It was learned that under Section 154, only one Section HO was a public servant. The CCP information can only be placed in front of the Section HO, but Section 182, the PPC, has talked about giving information to any government employee and not to any Section HA, Does not necessarily mean an FIR and the same can be placed before a magistrate or a civil servant and not only under section 154 under section HO, CPC action, section 182, PPC What can be done, therefore, if people are given the wrong information. Erwin, whose section 154, CR: PCs did not simply mean the information under section 182, could be requested by the PPC even if a direct complaint was proved to be wrong, and the intra-court appeal would be within the same limits. Discharged.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
