Thanks to the provisions of Sections 302 (b) / 149, 201 and 148 are of no legal significance, especially when the prosecution failed to prove the cause of death of the accused six months before the registration of the case, and the accused was charged. It was alleged that he had killed her with a recovered dagger, but he could not keep her safe. Likewise for 1/2 year and he would eliminate the dagger or at least bleed it from his blade, therefore, it was not credible that his body was indicated at the burial site. There was no legal evidence by the accused, as the aforementioned site had already been found by the investigating officer several times with prosecution witnesses, including a complaint. The NT, where the suspect did not exclusively take charge of the occupant's house, was identified a month before the suspect's body was identified outside the location a month before being identified. It was not accepted how the body was found. The burial and recovery of the deceased from the victim's home were not linked to the extra-judicial confession given by the accused after the God-fearing case was registered, against which the investigating agency could not submit impressive evidence. , Was not trusted by the investigating officer after the alleged failure to link the accused to the crime. The child's witness told the story of the parrot like a parrot, and it cannot be believed that he helped to create illicit proximity with his sisters. The trial court has told the trial court that the eyewitnesses of the child, despite witnessing the murder of the man and his father, remained silent for six months.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2009
