ABDUL GHANI ALIAS FAZAL GHANI versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF
Section 302/34 Evidence Definition The suspect was not charged in the FIR, but he first took the name of the deceased's father a month later, who did not appear in court for evidence. The case was held seven days after the arrest of the accused and it was stated that the complainant was not specified to delay the identification parade, although the FIR has stated that he could identify the accused, who fired on the accused. But it didn't provide any details of the features, etc. In the test identification parade, the complainant had identified only the accused as the accused, but did not specify the role played, which could be made a center for future identification. The complainant did not state that it was the suspect who fired. The complainant's victim's statement denied the medical evidence and the site plan. Inaccurately stated that the accused was the one who fired at the deceased, assuming that he was present at the time the trial was filed for trial and against the accused by the trial court. The sentence, he put aside the benefit of the doubt and he was acquitted of the charge and was released.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
