DR. IBADULLAH versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, PESHAWAR
Article 199 Constitutional application of the North West Frontier District Government Rules of Business, 2001, 18, 25 and Schedule V Civil Service Posting / Transfer Petitioner, District Magistrate, in its constitutional declaration demanded that the respondents' posting / Transfer not valid. The authority and any legal influence and was responsible for dismissing the notification in this regard was not able to satisfy the High Court for the applicant's lawyer, as to how the applicant suffered from unknown posting / transfer orders. ? And whether it affected any of his rights, no doubt, the Northwest District Frontier District Government Rules of Business, 25, 2001, required consultation with the District Administrator before issuing invasive orders, but he Non-compliance affected the rights of the defendants, if any; and they may have been agitated persons, but they did not challenge their transfer orders before any authority, which could be enforced under Article 199 of the Constitution, Generally the applicant should have his / her own right, which should be done in person as well as any locus of the applicant individually. Must not be standalone Only the respondents themselves can be challenged to challenge the legality of the unauthorized orders by the respondents, who were the victims / migrants and no other person is a provocative person for transfer / posting. There was no Lux Standby to challenge inappropriate orders for. Otherwise the meeting was made because the non-notification regarding the posting / transfer of the respondents was withdrawn by the competent authority.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
