Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Suit for the Collection of Articles of the Bridal Gifts (Prohibition) Act (XLIII of 1976), Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Circuit And the plaintiff's husband was forced to leave his home with the minor child. At the time of the marriage, the plaintiffs had brought Rs 2,11,660 worth of articles from their parents, the trial court dismissed the case, but the appellate court ruled that the lawyer was against the plaintiff first. On the basis that the list of divorced articles related to divorce was forged and cluttered and was not admissible in evidence. Secondly, there was a violation of the dowry, bride and groom's gift (restriction) Act, 1976 of more than Rs 5,000 and the offense was proved under the said act, without any objection to the list of articles related to the case. Was shown in evidence. On the other hand, the evidence was exhibited without any objection or reservation; no objection could be taken later in connection with the confession. ) Under the provisions of the Act 1976, when no objections were made to the articles of dowry at the time of the wife's intercourse, no objection could be raised on the basis of the above violation. The plaintiff was able to prove his case through anecdotal and credible evidence, with only credible and credible evidence presented by the trial witnesses. The plaintiff was entitled, in the circumstances, to the return of the articles of dowry, as attached to the plaintiff's money.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
