CHAIRMAN NABI QASIM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. versus ROIDAD KHAN
Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVII, Rr 10, 11 and Section 20 suit for return of legal objections by the plaintiff for the specific performance of the service contract and recovery of money against the court jurisdiction defendant The statement in writing was that Court 4 had no jurisdiction over the place where the case was filed and the plaintiff was obliged to return to the plaintiff to present a proper court attorney OVII, R 11, filed an application under CPC. On this basis it was reasonable to dismiss the claim that the cause of action was allegedly levied on the plaintiff `K and the defendant also resided at K's place and there was a civil court in B, where the case was filed. That had no jurisdiction to entertain. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff, and at the same time ordered that the plaintiff be returned with the documents and court fees to be presented to the court of competent jurisdiction. The E-Court said that the trial court, while accepting the appeal, set an unclean order and the case was sent to the civil court for stability on the merit. The initial agreement for service between the parties was executed at the same place - the terms and conditions for which the claimant was set, and he made his case based on the relevant clause in the law suit. Had disclosed that no legal action would be taken against the company beyond the scope of the lawsuit `K stated that the contract was securely affixed by the plaintiff with the same signature as Article 20 of the jurisdiction of the courts. Determined under the provisions of
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
