Decision to take oath in sections 42 and 8 of the Act (X of 1873), sections 6 and 8, when the plaintiff's evidence was partially recorded, the defendant submitted a petition in which he submitted It was decided that if the plaintiff and his son took the first oath. The court, holding hands on the Quran - a controversial store was not sold by the plaintiff in 1974 and the plaintiff filed a lawsuit, not considering any sale by the plaintiff. There will be no objection to passing the order in favor of the court. Statements of the parties, and the oath taken. And as a result, the defendant, upon appeal by the Appellate Court, received the remand for the trial court's decision and order aside, and for the trial and decision on the merit. The trial court had the obligation to record the parties' statements, during the interference between the defendant's plea in the oath and the opportunity to carefully consider the offer and acceptance of any of these resignations. Could not be His considered decision to adjourn the case was taken in accordance with the prediction presented in the defendant's statement and since the defendant accepted the offer of extension by the defendant and his 'S son was sworn in. Taken in open court pursuant to the demand, it was binding on the appellate court defendant Faisal that the plaintiff of the law had to suffer the consequences of his offer and consequently on the oath by the plaintiff. Consequently, the defendant was not allowed to resign under the law because appellant As
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
