Section 2 (b (b)) of delay in reporting the evidence cannot be described as irrelevant; when the cause of the delay was fully stated, the sole accused in the present case is the accused. There was no question of deliberation and consultation, except for a few minutes before the incident, there was a recurrence of the incident where there was no history of enmity between the parties where there was no hostility, then to make a report. I delayed, if any, that was not to be considered, the charge remained felonious until February 6, the year that would lead to the prosecution's testimony. In addition, the complainant was another eyewitness who related to the accused, but had no personal motive to make any false allegations, the prosecution was charged against the accused, sentencing the accused. The source was rightly recorded and the accused was sentenced to imprisonment, the amount of fines was retained, D was wrongly given to the accused as there is no provision under section 302 of the law to impose fines. That is, the PPC seed money was converted to compensation amount under Section 544A, CRPC, payable to the deceased's legal heirs. May be, as arrears of land revenue recovery
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
