Section 9 (c) appreciated the evidence, reduced the sentence, the accused was arrested while carrying 6kg of heroin, while on motorcycle, under Section 340 (2), CCPC, it was stated that he had been tried in this case. I was lied to. The defendant's statements made by the two witnesses were not trustworthy and were not enough to disprove the prosecution's evidence, putting millions of dollars worth of heroin on the accused was not credible and the accused merely saved his story. Was presented for The officers of the Anti-Narcotic Force were not guilty of any of the false allegations and their recovery statements were a permanent investigation officer; the law did not require the informant's name to be disclosed, but the site plan was prepared. Was not fatal in what was exhibited. The court was in the form of granule powder, which reportedly had no positive heroin weight on it, as we were the defendants to be charged with wrap and bags, to properly examine the evidence in the circumstances. Later recorded in accordance with the law, which was retained as the first offender as a non-criminal, in the interest of justice, his prison sentence was reduced. From twelve years I RI to eight years \ RI and two lakh to one lakh rupees \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
