The complainant accused of defining section 2 302 (b) was directly named by the complainant in his immediately filed report. Appealing without consideration, without coercion and because nothing was on record to show that the accused was insane at the time of the crime and the medical board's opinion reflected his mental state. When the suspect was brutally murdered after the incident. Her niece, a 5/6-month-old baby girl, was found murdered by a baby's throat, strangled to death, in retaliation for voluntary, voluntary and genuine judicial confession, but due to circumstances. The statement of the prosecution's witness, as well as the statement of the prosecution's witness, who personally handed the girl over to the accused, as well as her strongly certified medical evidence. And whose statement could not be corroded by cross-examination, the prosecutor successfully proved his case against the accused, while his mere madness at the time of the incident did not prove that Insanity was identified during the trial At the time of the incident, nothing was available on the record to show that the defendant or any of his relatives had requested such insanity as trial court evidence. Was rightly praised and came to an unfair conclusion that was not open to interference by the High Court's conviction and sentence. The conviction was upheld by the trial court
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
