NAWABZADA TAHIR BINYAMIN KHAN versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN,WAPDA, LAHORE
Sections 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 Determination of Compensation Re Refer to the referee court's appellant / landlord, whose land was acquired, not satisfied with the compensation of the land collector, in the referee court The reference was filed in which the appellant / confiscated landlords from Rs 4,939 to Rs 12,000 on a canal increased partially due to partial aggravation, some of the land acquired The portion was located on the main road and the cost was high enough for which the Land Acquisition Collector must designate an independent local. Considering the determination of the location of the land acquired by the Commissioner, the referee court did not take into account the fact that it was on the main road, and the location of a building and the land acquired by trade in nature, The most probable decision and order was in nature that the referee court was set aside and after the appointment of the local commission, the case was presented to the court for re-decision. The inspector will present a detailed report to the court in view of the criteria set forth in section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and provide the parties with the opportunity to lead the supportive and contradictory evidence. After doing
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
