Find a Lawyer

KHAN SARDAR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/148/149 bail, the grant of further inquiry records, revealed that the accused, although nominated in the FIR, had been charged with ineffective firing. The role was assigned. The site plan had no recovered from the locations assigned to it, but the trial had not yet determined whether it was a common item and attracted the provisions of section 148/149, PPC. To do or not The material available on record brought the case of the accused into the realm of inquiry which entitles them to the privilege of bail.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009

• JAVED v. State 2009 MLD 1049
• NADIA SHABNUM v. LAND ACQUISITON COLLECTOR (N-55) N.H.A., D.I. KHAN SARAYE GAMBILA PROJECT D.I. KHAN 2009 CLC 1055
• NAWAB KHAN v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1062
• Nawabzada TAHIR BINYAMIN KHAN v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman,WAPDA, Lahore 2009 CLC 1066
• KHURSHEED BIBI v. S.P., D.I. KHAN 2009 MLD 1076
• ANWAR ZEB v. MUHAMMAD RIAZ 2009 PCrLJ 1085
• RAEEP KHAN v. State 2009 MLD 1096
• ABDUL QADOOS v. SARWAR KHAN 2009 PCrLJ 1106

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2009 →

family advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes