Article 35, AOA & O.L.I., R. Constitution 33 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Supply In the present case, there was no evidence of the respondents' expenditure in the case, CPC applied. Will not In connection with the compensation expense, the court had taken action under Section 35A, CPC in awarding heavy costs to the respondents, in accordance with Section 35A Subsection (2), CPC, for maximum compensation expense. The maximum fixed limit shall not be more than twenty five thousand rupees, while the appellate court, by exceeding the maximum limit prescribed by law, was given to the respondents thirty thousand rupees as compensation, as provided in section 35A. Under, read with the AXL, R33, CPC, the appellate court prevented the successful party from paying compensation, its irrevocable rule I was expressly unlawful and against the spirit of Article 35A, CPC, the CPC cautioned the trial court to pay compensation. If the successful party against the defeated party, whether the claim or defense was false, and the successful party pleaded in the initial phase of the case, the High Court reduced the expenditure from Rs 30,000 to Rs 3000.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
