Sections 6 and 13 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 pre-emptive deposit of respondents / pre-emptor, submitted 1 / 3rd of the pre-emption amount as did the litigation for the applicants. I've been told However, the defendant / seller contested the view that the pre-emptor had not submitted the off / consideration portion of the sale shown in the mutation, but less than that amount the appellate court had formulated the same view and if any The mistake was that by a trial court or an appeals court, the defendant should have applied for a review of the decision that was available to him on the treatment he had. When the fact of the 1/3 submission was disputed by the defendant, after the evidence was recorded it was to be ascertained, but this process could be considered only at the trial stage and not at the trial. In the first phase, there were no illegal or irregularities in attracting controversial decisions, high revision jurisdiction under the circumstances. Court Petition Rejected \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
