The right of appeal / revision under section 9, section 9, retaining the right to appeal and revise under the framework provided under section 9 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, had nothing to do with it or to disperse. In the scheme of the Sa Act for the control and integration of the rights of the hard-working parties, the explicit rights were clearly in place, and for this reason, appeals and revisions were considered from the earliest times to form the law, But when ordinary courts were capable of deciding the disputed legal rights, then such courts had general rules of procedure and appeals would be lied to, if allowed under the preliminary rules. Nonetheless, it has been claimed that legal rights will arise under special law, which did not grant the right of appeal since the sessions court exercised it under the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005. And there was no disclosure in the Act that the court would constitute a court under this Act. As a special court, the rules of the common law will apply in the form of a criminal procedure, including the right to appeal and review in conformity with the relevant law of law. Different and limited meanings cannot be given to exclude the right to appeal and review, especially since there was no clear provision in the Victims' Rights Act for filing appeals and review arising out of the Unlawful Disposal Act 2005, The authority to exercise powers under the Act, the present Code of Conduct, was a session court formed under the Code of 1898,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
