SHAMSHAD versus FEDERAL BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
Arts, 66, 68 and (185 ()) Procedures and Business Practices Regulations in the National Assembly, R (()) Prohibiting the Privilege of Members of Parliament and Discussion in Parliament Temporarily Submitting Applicant's Provisions Had a look. Article 66 and 68 of the Constitution and R 201 (5) of the Code of Business Conduct in the National Assembly, the Standing Committee of the National Assembly was not given the authority to investigate the matter which was a subpoena before the High. Neither the court nor it can in any way impose any action on a judge of a court to discuss the principles of the trichotomy of power, and the chairman of the standing committee is discriminatory and using powers is illegal. Is in the process of being processed. Under Article 66 of the Constitution or in accordance with the Business Conduct and the Code of Conduct in the National Assembly, there may be no violation or violation of other provisions of the Constitution. Remember, the court found that the Supreme Court did not claim supremacy, but at the same time, it was the constitutional duty of the judiciary, the executive and the judiciary, to maintain the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law. They were ordered to perform their duties inside. The constitution and the boundaries set by law were not in the presence and jurisdiction of the privilege of any House or its committee and it was to be established before the court law that once it was established, the courts were required by any court. Or by Parliament or its committee, to prevent their hands from unwarranted action, should not be taken as a mechanism whereby unnecessary confrontation and chaos can occur.
