Find a Lawyer

MST. SANOBAR SULTAN versus OBAIDULLAH KHAN

Sections 13 and 2 (c) and (i) show the tenant being a co-owner of the rental premises by purchasing a share of the property from the owner, in the current owner situation, showing that the tenants One of them bought this part. Landlord became co-owner of tenants from co-owners of land and such tenants ceased to be tenants; landlords say that tenants cannot refuse a relationship even after purchasing property from landlords, joint property. I was not a permanent buyer of any of the shareholder's acquisitions, lost its status as a "tenant" and became a co-owner who fell in appreciation of the landlord's shareholder. Was entitled to retain the joint property until the division and the eviction order could not be executed which rented West Pakistan by controller could not be approved under the provisions of the Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD SIDDIQUE v. State 2009 PLD 58
• SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB HEALTH DEPARTMENT, LAHORE v. Dr. ABIDA IQBAL 2009 SCMR 61
• HARIS STEEL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2009 PLD 61
• AHMED BROTHER TRADE INTERNATIONAL, GILGIT v. COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, CUSTOM HOUSE, RAWALPINDI/ISLAMABAD 2009 PTD 63
• INAMUL HAQ v. MUHAMMAD SALIM BHATTI 2009 SCMR 74
• SHAMSHAD v. FEDERAL BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION 2009 PLD 75
• Ch. MAQBOOL AHMED v. CUSTOMS, FEDERAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2009 PTD 77
• MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ v. MEMBER (REVENUE) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB; LAHORE 2009 PLC(CS) 79

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Darya Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes