The OI, R10 la Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the contempt of court party, the Division Bench of the Intra-Court of Appeal High Court, however, upheld the decision of the Single. Did not set aside. The judge, for all intents and purposes yet and the influence of the single judge's decision was conveyed, and for all legal and practical purposes, it was, in the present case, merged into the judgment given by the Division Bench question, The legal heir was about to enforce (petitioner) the original immunity for the grant of his rights in the plots in the civil suit, in which the Division Bench Council, with both parties, allowed both parties to consent. All sides, including those who have moved. The contempt of court petition against the officials of the Local Development Authority was taking part in the proceedings of the case which was pending, the decision rendered by the Division Bench was appealed and, therefore, the contempt of the Single Judge Court. There was no chance of prosecution, which merged in the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court, the same judge could not be imposed by an improper order of a single judge and a single judge approved. It is a very harsh and unlawful order to completely disregard the decisions of the High Court and the Division Bench of the Supreme Court as it cannot be imagined that the parties did not inform the Single Judge about these decisions when the Single The judge was in serious legal error, dismissing the applicant's request under the OI, R10, CPC, on the basis that he had a similar application in the first period of trial.
