Re-reviewing the conviction of the Sections 302 (b) / 324/148/149 evidence, the reduction of minor contradictions in the evidence impacted the High Court of the six persons sentenced to death under the Section 30 Section (b) PPC. The rest of the accused were sentenced differently and sentenced to other crimes, the legality incident was a one-day incident, an FIR was immediately registered and the motive was established even by the accused. The statements acknowledged the enmity and the intention, the parties knew each other because they were residents of the same area, so the question of finding a liar was impossible. His case was completely proved by the ocular evidence and was confirmed by medical evidence and the accused was also admitted, but to some extent the formation of the illegal assembly, initially and The attack on the mob led to two deaths and injuries. A prosecution witness proved beyond any doubt that the blood-stained ground was collected from the places where the victims had died. It was specifically mentioned by the prosecution witnesses and they were proved by medical evidence as the faces were recovered from the bodies of the two persons, the prosecution's witnesses were long examined. There was nothing conducive to the defense of their mouth Minor differences could not be a matter of prosecution The accused had come to the wedding ceremony without any weapons and weapons, and for the moment it was one of the dead who came upon them. He objected and started arguing before Baratis slapping the two accused
