Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AHMED BROTHER TRADE INTERNATIONAL, GILGIT versus COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, CUSTOM HOUSE, RAWALPINDI/ISLAMABAD


Sections 32 (1), 180 and 168 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act (IX of 1950), Section 3 (1) of the Drugs Control Act (XXXI of 1976), the Aidan Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). The imported goods were seized in the dry port area without notice of the seizure notice, and no inquiry was imposed, and inquiries were being made on the imposition of a ban on imported goods in the country, while providing formal opportunity for the goods. It was later captured. To provide proof of import to the importer, even the agency from which the importer claimed to import the goods, answered the question by the customs authorities despite the interval of 1/2 month No, notice was issued to the importer after the show affected the formal occupation of the goods but no satisfactory response was received by the importer. The importer was issued the showcase notice; The leave application for was dismissed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.