INSPECTOR-GENERAL (PRISONS) N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR versus SYED JAFFAR SHAH
Section 3 Pakistan Jail Rules, 1978 RR 340 (i) (IV), 341, 342, 1168, 1024 and 1072 (1) North West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (1974), Sections 4 and 7 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) discharging a service warder, facilitating the escape of prisoners from head warders, assistant superintendent jails, and superintendent prisons; the charge of the service tribunal on appeal included three steps in such sentence. Reduced and restored civil. Employees' utility in serving the department was that such a reduction in the amount of fines would encourage the elimination of discipline among prison officials who condemned the accuracy ladder used for white washing. The prisoner, who was in the possession of a pistol and without his consent, could not implement the prison escape program, which was the result of direct intervention by civil servants. The Superintendent Prison Administration was in charge of the Jail, Assistant Superintendent Jail was on supervisory duty at the relevant time; The order was dismissed for cell search, and the warder responsible for the search of the guilty prisoners and visitors in the courtyard was severely neglected by the civil servants. In the case of highly charged negligence and gross misconduct, such punishment or unnecessary softening and softening cannot be justified in the case of punishment because the administration's policy of retaining an irresponsible person in a sensitive prison service. Will be profitable. Employees responsible for such incident are equally liable, will deserve equal treatment in case of punishment.
