Find a Lawyer

SYED ABDUL GHAFOOR SHAH versus SYED LUQMAN

Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Tenant default defaults and landlord's personal need Personal property description The basis of default in the case of eviction of a tenant from the factories opened by the courts Was called upon. The landlord refuses to pay the monthly rent and the personal rent required by the landlord and the tenant's relationship to the landlord's request for eviction by the landlord in the occupation of the landlord There was a number that was approved for the dismissal order, which was retained by the High Court, the tenant could not take advantage of this position and the eviction proceedings could not be discouraged by the excuse that the number of stores under consideration. The property in question was clearly the same property as the property partner in particular Luck had rented it. When no one else claimed ownership / ownership rights, there is harmony. The results below of both the courts, the Supreme Court did not see any room for interference in the decision but the appeal was denied.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• MUHAMMAD JAMIL KHAN v. PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR through Registrar 2009 SCMR 34
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. FATIMA SHARIF TEXTILE, KASUR 2009 PTD 37
• TARIQ MEHMOOD v. THE STATE through Deputy Attorney-General, Peshawar 2009 PLD 39
• Mst. SHABANA IRFAN v. MUHAMMAD SHAM KHAN 2009 SCMR 40
• Mst. SEEMA BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ 2009 PLD 45
• INSPECTOR-GENERAL (PRISONS) N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR v. Syed JAFFAR SHAH 2009 PLC(CS) 47
• MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. State 2009 PLD 49
• GHULAM SIDDIQUE v. Malik MUHAMMAD QASIM 2009 SCMR 51

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

top advocates from Khyber Agency lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes