Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SIDDIQUE versus MALIK MUHAMMAD QASIM

Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Demand for Limitation of Limitation The applicant's proper duty for subordinate decision of the High Court was a detailed and reasonable cause, leaving no scope for further consideration. It was asked for consideration that the decision did not face any weakness. In relation to the facts, legal or factual, the interference of the bail plea of the applicants / applicants of the Supreme Court cannot be satisfied that contrary to the views expressed by the High Court, the Supreme Court refused to grant leave of appeal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Syed ABDUL GHAFOOR SHAH v. Syed LUQMAN 2009 SCMR 45
• Mst. SEEMA BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ 2009 PLD 45
• INSPECTOR-GENERAL (PRISONS) N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR v. Syed JAFFAR SHAH 2009 PLC(CS) 47
• MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. State 2009 PLD 49
• MUHAMMAD TASAWEER v. Hafiz ZULKARNAIN 2009 PLD 53
• ALAMGIR KHAN v. Haji ABDUL SITTAR KHAN 2009 SCMR 54
• MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD SIDDIQUE v. State 2009 PLD 58
• SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB HEALTH DEPARTMENT, LAHORE v. Dr. ABIDA IQBAL 2009 SCMR 61

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

registration advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes