MEHAR MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION
Appellant's advice when dismissing the service of an employee of Arts 212 and 25 Corporation was to change the dismissal of the appellant into a compulsory retirement because he was treated unfairly with colleagues as well. And he was treated unfairly. This appellant was expected to leave the widow, a son and three daughters, who rely solely on the deceased, and that while dealing with the matter, they were entitled to the pension and pension benefits of the appellant as the affected party. Were. Discrimination was alleged, the court could not ignore its implications. Similar treatment with all was the basic principle on which justice was restored under the law. If justice is not managed, it can have many negative and negative effects on society as well. The dissatisfaction and disappointment in the social system, and it cannot be denied that social justice was a motive and is included in the Constitution's Supreme Court, in the circumstances, partially accepted this appeal, setting aside the rejected decision. Appellant's dismissal dismissed. In compulsory retirement, the legal representative of the appellant, held, shall be entitled to the pensionary benefits payable under the law.
