Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD versus MUHAMMAD AZAM CH.

Article 212 (3) Replacing / terminating the services of a probationer civil servant when the service tribunal had written a detailed and reasonable request to discuss all aspects of the matter, with no further consideration. There were no illegal or weak, legal or factual claims to interfere with the unknown decision. The record was not identified by the applicant department as incorrect or unreadable. The civil servant's services could not be terminated without investigation for any reason / disciplinary proceedings and the public servant should have been provided with a reasonable opportunity to clarify the unsatisfactory performance of his position, the Supreme Court refused to intervene. And dismissed the appeal for leave of appeal.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Mehar MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION 2009 PLC(CS) 523
• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. State 2009 SCMR 527
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF 2009 PLD 531
• MUHAMMAD ARIF BALOCH v. State 2009 SCMR 536
• Mst. BIVI v. GHULAM MURTAZA 2009 SCMR 540
• AMAN ULLAH v. State 2009 PLD 542
• ABDUL MANAN v. State 2009 SCMR 544
• MIR KOHI KHAN v. NOOR MUHAMMAD 2009 PLD 544

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

solicitors from Buchay Key lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes