Section 5A5A / & 34 & 5 365/3434 Evidence Examination, abduction reduction, 13-year-old boy who had no previous illness or complaint for false imprisonment against the accused, He confirmed her abduction and detention by making a very clear and credible statement on the secret place, which her father confirmed, medical evidence and the circumstances of the case where the kidnapper remained in custody for two days. There was no doubt about the identity of each of the accused, with their specific role. However, neither the FIR nor the ransom disclosed the release of the kidnappers. Payment was made, even that the kidnappers had not stated before the trial court the accused had demanded a ransom. His father also did not prove on the record that the cell phones recovered from the possession of the accused were used by him to demand ransom prosecution, therefore, failed to prove the motive of the incident. Later, although the kidnapping and detention of the kidnappers in the secret place was found guilty under Section 365A / under 34, the PPC was consequently changed to Section 6565 /, 34, PPC. Went and since he was in prison for more than six years, his sentence was reduced to prisoners who have already passed through the circumstances.
