FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus MIAN MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF
Sections 14 (5) (5A), (6), 11 and 99 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 184 (3), 199, 225, 63 (h) (1) and 188 Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, A. XXVI, R 8 The Supreme Court's decision reviewing the eligibility and disqualification of the candidates for the hearing decisions, namely the High Court and the Supreme Court, was reviewed, leading to some factual issues. And the legal provisions were not exposed. Until the court notes and, therefore, justice was not considered to be a misunderstanding, such error appears on the face of a review of the record record that would have led to the extraordinary removal of Superior Courts judges. And recognize extraordinary events. The verdict, it was stated, was - through a cruel force, deviating from the constitutional clauses - that triggered an unprecedented patriotic movement, during the restoration of these judges and the failure to appear before the courts. Applicants were subsequently presented to the courts, which cannot be compromised, nor can anyone be exposed to discrimination; the finding of facts related to such assumptions was interrupted, jurisdictional, Both the appeals filed under Section 14 (5) of the Representation should be made or directed against the approval of the People's Act 1976 and the nomination papers. The information (the Act section was fixed period to decide appeals schedule issued by the 14 (5A)) or must first decide. Under Section 11, the Chief Election Commissioner read with section 14 (5) of the said Act. Since the appeals decision was not made till then, the order of the Chief Election Commissioner in which it
