Sections 302 (b) / 34, 324/34 and 337a (ii) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 evidence was not denied to the witness to the presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident. Not challenged in which the incident was not disputed, but was actually acknowledged, thus, according to the prosecution's suggestion that this happened, in which three people were killed and another person was actually killed. I was seriously injured, in which an incident occurred. There was no article on the market before a bank, but the FIR's effect was that the incident had caused panic or panic among the public, and there was no evidence that the incident had any impact on the public or anyone. There is also a sense of fear or insecurity in the class. In section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, neither the public nor the community or any community was attracted to the matter; the motive behind the incident was the tension in the relations between the first parties and no evidence to show the evidence. The evidence was not brought to the record. His objection was that he would not kill the deceased, but would also target terrorists in the general public, as the aforesaid offense was exempted from punishment and punishment under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. , But the rest were sentenced and sentenced. Maintained in the conditions
