GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD versus FARHEEN RASHID
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 21 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), amended the Penal Service Tribunal, jurisdiction of the charge sheet object and the greater punishment for termination of service to the jurisdiction by the Service Tribunal to prevent the annual increase for a period. Converted into minor fines. With no effect, the two-year authorities claimed that since the public servant committed theft, the criminal case should have been filed by the public servant on the basis of his case that the charge sheet by the authorities was like this. Was not charged. The specific charge was laid against an individual who was entitled to know the nature of the charge at an early stage. The purpose of the charge sheet was to inform the accused, either directly and / and clearly, in the case in which the civil servant was employed. Was imposed and should state it with a lot of clearance and assurance. The Department intended to prove against it and from which it would have to clear itself during the confiscation pro- ceedings The Sidings Service Tribunal did not advertise the contents of the charge sheet, show cause notice, inquiry report and removal order. The Inquiry Officer recommended filing a criminal case against a public servant in connection with the recovery of stolen money from the complainant on their charge sheet and suspicious contents of the show. Such notice was not included in the notice notice; the service tribunal had sufficient authority to convert the larger sentence to a minor fine, for the same reason that the same court had to intervene in the judgment passed by the service tribunal. Denied because the authorities are not concerned about public importance
