Sections 302 (b) and 308 (2) / 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the evidence of the conspiracy against the evidence of the conspiracy against the accused allegedly made by the accused to the witness of the court Is unable to rely on additional judicial confession. Deprived of the fact, the accused had no opportunity to make such a confessional statement to the deceased's cousin, who did not even try to restrain the confessional statement from the accused, presented only by eyewitnesses. Ocular testimony is based on many circumstances. In the absence of any collusion from an independent and inaccessible source, the evidence alone cannot be safely relied upon, though it was useless to retrieve a pistol from a crime-related suspect, as it was somewhat overstated. And the prosecution was suspected of being cut off. Medical evidence in the recovery memo could not support the prosecution version, which did not prove that it could be identified by any misinterpretation or precise assessment of the evidence to warrant interference by the credible account, which led to their acquittal. Could point to the verdict, which was neither hypothetical nor speculative, and the prosecution's case was doubtful, and the hearing of the case was without leave to appeal. Refused to complain in the circumstances
