Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ULLAH versus STATE

Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) guarantees, the grants of prohibited elements were not recovered directly from the possession of the accused, but from them. Even the cabin built on the root of the bus question, whether it was said that the cabin was in the driver's special use or because of a realistic dispute with the passengers, could not be resolved in the request for bail, the defendant's case, as such, Further investigation was alleged. Doing hail accordingly

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• ECHO WEST INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. LAHORE v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary 2009 CLD 937
• IRSHAD ULLAH v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2009 SCMR 941
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division v. SHAHID HAYAT 2009 PLC(CS) 951
• SAJJAD AHMAD JAVED BHATTI v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad 2009 PLC(CS) 953
• CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY through Director-General v. JAVED AHMAD 2009 SCMR 956
• ANWAR ALI v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE HESCO (WAPDA), HYDERABAD 2009 PLC(CS) 963
• GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Director-General, Ministry of Interior, Islamabad v. FARHEEN RASHID 2009 PLC(CS) 966
• FAZAL DIN & SONS (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 2009 SCMR 973

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

inheritance advocates near Mir Ali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes