EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GEPCO LIMITED versus LIAQAT ALI
Section A, AA and Pakistan Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) The major conviction for refusing the allegations is that the Department of Inquiry, without any departmental inquiry, imposed mandatory retirement effect, therefore, Reinstatement of the service tribunal The respondents in their service, in full response, denied their defense requests as well as the supporting documents as well as the allegations of dishonesty of the relevant authorities against them, as the defendants The allegation was denied by the SEC, so it too became controversial and required an inquiry. Estimates in Sections 3 and 5 of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 Authorized Authority, even for the administration of justice were obliged to follow the prescribed procedure before approving the imposition of a fine. That is, a mandatory retirement from work was not an event. E (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, where the opportunity to conduct an inquiry or to be heard may be provided in the legal jurisdiction of section 3 or section 3A, 5 (4) and sewer removal from Servic. It neither appealed to them nor filed a lawsuit under such provisions of the law, which refused to interfere with the decision passed by the service tribunal. Refused
