PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER versus MUHAMMAD ZAHID
The Preamble Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act (XVII of 1996), Analysis of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 2A, 4 and 25 are the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court scope person as Article 199 (5 of the Conduct Employees). ) I mentioned. The Telegraph and Telephone Department initially transferred the corporation under the relevant provisions of the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Act, 1991, and subsequently succeeded by the PTCL, and paid for its duties and duties in the International Gateway Exchange. Operators were subsequently permanently added or regularly added to. The laws are essentially related to one of the issues of the Federation under the provisions of Article 199 of the Constitution, similar duties and functions are being terminated by employees as the operators cannot be distinguished at the International Gateway Exchange. And it has nothing to do with it. Although the affairs of the federation were awarded to Corpora by PTCL now subject to PTCL terminated by PTCL and finally, in the context of the person described in Article 199 (5) of the Constitution. As a result, the employees were made eligible for constitutional jurisdiction. The case of the HC of employees / respondents was that they were employed on a daily wage and were not made regular despite having served for more than 2 years as contract employees are renewed from time to time. That they are being discriminated against as other operators serving permanently with the PTCL or were regulated under the appropriate course because the International Gateway
