Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD KIANI versus BILAL UMAIR

Section 17 (8) (9) Withdrawal Request The tenant was instructed under Section 17 (8) of the Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance 2001 to submit the rent on or before the due date which he was charged under section 17 (9). ) Failed to effect the Islamabad rent ban ordinance. , 2001, was mandatory. Section 17 (9) of the Ordinance results in disobedience or non-compliance of the rent controller's order, leaving the rent controller with no discretion except that he be ordered to evict the tenant without further action rules. Go

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• BOARD OF TRUSTEES, KARACHI PORT TRUST v. ORGANIZATION OF K.P.T. WORKERS 2009 SCMR 994
• FARHAD ALI v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN POST OFFICE 2009 PLC(CS) 996
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED through General Manager v. MUHAMMAD ZAHID 2009 PLC(CS) 1001
• KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPN. v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 2009 SCMR 1005
• BASHIR AHMED v. ABDUL AZIZ 2009 SCMR 1014
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. IRFAN TARIQ 2009 SCMR 1018
• AHMAD JAN v. Qazi AZIZUL HAQ 2009 SCMR 1022
• Mian MUHAMMAD ASIF v. FAHAD 2009 SCMR 1030

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates from Dandot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes